Page 1 of 1

Price's System

Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 2:58 am
by Bellic
Account Name:
Bellic

Time of bug:
07:34 (time in game).

Where:
Map: 6.3 pos (84.64) Silosia (the north's store) (clothes).

What:
I think that the system of prices is not perfect yet.

Why:
Because this system puts low prices to better objects and high prices to worse things.

Other comments:
I hope this kind of bugs be fixed soon.
For example:

Worn cowboy jeans
Stats:
Armor: 2%
Dodge: 1%
Walk speed: 1%
It was in the store for: $250

Cowboy jeans
Stats:
Armor: 3%
Dodge: 2%
Walk speed: 2%
It was in the store for: $380

Re: Price's System

Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 11:18 am
by Rha
What is the issue...?

The better item clearly has a higher price...
This makes sense to me..

And how is it a bug?

Re: Price's System

Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 11:37 am
by Aegis
Bellic wrote: Wed Jul 05, 2017 2:58 am ]

Worn cowboy jeans
Stats:
Armor: 2%
Dodge: 1%
Walk speed: 1%
It was in the store for: $250

Cowboy jeans
Stats:
Armor: 3%
Dodge: 2%
Walk speed: 2%
It was in the store for: $380
mmh.. the way you display it here seems to be correct how its supposed to be... worn is lesser quality and costs 250, original normal name is the best quality for an item, wich in this case is sold at 380... the way you're reporting it should be the other way around if it was bugged/wrong 🤔?

Re: Price's System

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 7:41 am
by Bellic
I think it is not important if it is a bug or is not, the real problem is that the players can take advantage of this and resell the items in a highter price, and I would not want to them cheat to players of low level, I can understand perfectly if you say "he/she/they just took the opportunity and that is ok" if it is the case, fine, I have no problem :P
But I thought, just in case, after all, I believed that this is something that other players might abuse.
Anyways, I think that the word "bug" means "error in computer program/system that causes it to produce an incorrect or unexpected result".
And I do not say it, that says the science... Ok no, it was Wikipedia, lol :lol:


Thanks in advance for take your time for read and answer this post, see you next time! :P